As our vehicles become increasingly technologically advanced, it's crucial to grasp the significance of code clearing and calibrations in the context of automotive repairs and insurance claims. Understanding how these processes factor into pre, mid, and post-repair stages can make all the difference.
Manufacturers issue specific position statements that dictate how these procedures should be carried out. Some manufacturers emphasize their importance by using words like "MUST" or "ESSENTIAL" in their directives, while others opt for terms like "recommend" or "suggested." This variation can lead to potential discrepancies, especially when dealing with insurance companies that rely on "Average Cost of Repair" calculations.
Let's illustrate this with a real-life example: an insurer's directive regarding a recent repair. In this case, the insurer's stance was that a scan was unnecessary if no dashboard faults were evident, citing a lifetime warranty on all repairs. However, the manufacturer's position was clear: all vehicles undergoing collision damage assessments must undergo Diagnostic Trouble Code (DTC) testing during the repair estimation process. Furthermore, a post-repair scan is required to ensure that faults have been rectified and no new ones have arisen during repairs.
Conducting a pre-repair scan can reveal hidden issues that might not be immediately apparent. A post-repair scan serves to reset your vehicle's systems and validate the full functionality of safety features, sensor modules, and battery systems. It's essential to note that not all fault codes trigger dashboard warning lights. Some may be classified as hard faults, persisting until addressed, potentially distracting from genuine future concerns.
Andrea McCarthy
McCarthy Panel Works